Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 14:33:55 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin Subject: Re: fhandler_console Message-ID: <20010302143355.R5481@cygbert.vinschen.de> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin References: <7888578378 DOT 20010220130012 AT logos-m DOT ru> <17613156858 DOT 20010223151715 AT logos-m DOT ru> <20010226191432 DOT E6209 AT redhat DOT com> <20010228182620 DOT R8464 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <109112986916 DOT 20010228215037 AT logos-m DOT ru> <20010228203308 DOT V8464 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <83117508187 DOT 20010228230559 AT logos-m DOT ru> <20010301101600 DOT C874 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <20010302132358 DOT Q5481 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <16264348483 DOT 20010302155321 AT logos-m DOT ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <16264348483.20010302155321@logos-m.ru>; from deo@logos-m.ru on Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 03:53:21PM +0300 On Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 03:53:21PM +0300, Egor Duda wrote: > Hi! > > Friday, 02 March, 2001 Corinna Vinschen cygwin-patches AT cygwin DOT com wrote: > > CV> the problem disappeared after a full rebuild of Cygwin today. > CV> I fear I have created the problem by myself for some reason. > CV> The rebuild solved the problem immediately. Is it possible > CV> that you always need a full rebuild after there's a change > CV> in class hierarchies? Your change has moved some class members > CV> in the fhandler class hierarchy, so... > > hmm. i don't think so. unless something goes wrong with your > dependency files. i'm doing test builds without doing 'make clean' > beforehand. i did complete rebuild almost half year ago. and yet i do > change class members from time to time. after fhandler_console > patch there was a lot of files being rebuilt (all that include > fhandler.h). The only reason of broken build i can imagine is > that patching and building is done on different machines, with source > code shared over network, and their clocks wasn't properly > synchronized. No everything was patched and build locally. Anyway, it's ok. Now you can create NEW EXCITING patches instead of debugging old boring patches :-) Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc. -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple