Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 23:29:54 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin Subject: Re: New symlinks. Message-ID: <20010228232954.A344@cygbert.vinschen.de> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from heribert_dahms@icon-gmbh.de on Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 10:22:32PM +0100 On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 10:22:32PM +0100, Heribert Dahms wrote: > Yeah, and what should > find . | xargs ls -ld > find implicitly and write explicitly? It should implicitely find foo and explicitely write `foo' since that is given from find to xargs. Corinna My point is simply iff somebody asks for foo.lnk _knowingly_ Cygwin shouldn't react with `File not found'. That's the true surprise IMO. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc. -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple