Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <BF35D9C143BCCC4EB63181B67C9320C804DD1F@serv-075.icon-germany.local>
From: Heribert Dahms <heribert_dahms AT icon-gmbh DOT de>
To: "'Corinna Vinschen'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: RE: New symlinks.
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 22:22:32 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
Content-Type: text/plain

Yeah, and what should
	find . | xargs ls -ld
find implicitly and write explicitly?

Bye, Heribert (heribert_dahms AT icon-gmbh DOT de)

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Corinna Vinschen [SMTP:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com]
> Sent:	Wednesday, February 28, 2001 10:07
> To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
> Subject:	Re: New symlinks.
> 
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 01:32:01PM -0500, McCunney, Dennis wrote:
> > Why not treat the new symlinks like Unix "." files: the .lnk extension
> is
> > not shown in a standard directory list, but _will_ be shown by "ls -a",
> or
> > if the user provides the explicit file name to ls.
> 
> That's my point. Not with `ls -a' but explicitely.
> 
> Corinna
> 
> -- 
> Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
> Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
> Red Hat, Inc.
> 
> --
> Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple