Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 10:07:22 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: New symlinks.
Message-ID: <20010228100722.A8464@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <A680DF2C0A29D411B4F60008C7F40FED228B9B AT EXCHANGERSW2 DOT roper DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <A680DF2C0A29D411B4F60008C7F40FED228B9B@EXCHANGERSW2.roper.com>; from DMcCunney@roper.com on Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 01:32:01PM -0500

On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 01:32:01PM -0500, McCunney, Dennis wrote:
> Why not treat the new symlinks like Unix "." files: the .lnk extension is
> not shown in a standard directory list, but _will_ be shown by "ls -a", or
> if the user provides the explicit file name to ls.

That's my point. Not with `ls -a' but explicitely.

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple