Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 10:34:14 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT]: Important change to symbolic linkfunctionality Message-ID: <20010225103414.W908@cygbert.vinschen.de> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin References: <5 DOT 0 DOT 2 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 20010223120510 DOT 02408cf0 AT mailhost> <3A96C959 DOT ADC04E3 AT yahoo DOT com> <3A96CAA7 DOT 590B96A7 AT yahoo DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3A96CAA7.590B96A7@yahoo.com>; from earnie_boyd@yahoo.com on Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 03:40:07PM -0500 On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 03:40:07PM -0500, Earnie Boyd wrote: > Earnie Boyd wrote: > > Just for kicks, after reading this post, I did `touch foo.lnk' and have > > a circular reference to foo.lnk. The directory listing actually shows > > the filename as foo.lnk. That's solved now. > I then said, "Hmm... What'll happen if I `ln -s foo.lnk bar.lnk'?" So > I, did just that and the listing show bar -> foo.lnk. I was hoping to > see bar.lnk in the listing. Both `cat bar' and `cat bar.lnk' give the > contents of foo.lnk. That's too. I hope that will meet everyone's expectation. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc. -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple