Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 13:49:54 -0800
Message-Id: <200102242149.f1OLns802613@quickmonkey.com>
From: MADHU <madhu AT quickmonkey DOT com>
To: cgf AT redhat DOT com
CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
In-reply-to: <20010224164002.B6385@redhat.com> (message from Chris Faylor on
	Sat, 24 Feb 2001 16:40:02 -0500)
Subject: Re: cygwin with sockscap32
X-Url: http://www.meer.net/~enometh/
Reply-to: madhu AT quickmonkey DOT com
X-Attribution: Madhu
References: <200102222041 DOT f1MKfKj29110 AT quickmonkey DOT com> <20010224164002 DOT B6385 AT redhat DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.13.7 - "Awazu")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII


You may choose to igmore the problem, as you have, and hope it goes
away, but it hasnt. cygwin is unusable with sockscap, while it was
before: because of changes to the code. I would apprecciate it if you
could keep quietif you have nothing of value to add to the discussion,
and random rants.
Thanks
Regards
madhu


  |Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 16:40:02 -0500
  |From: Chris Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
  |On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 12:41:20PM -0800, MADHU wrote:
  |>helu,
  |>that is just your opinion, I was seeking a little more technical
  |>explanation, and as I pointed out in my post, and my privatre response
  |>to ernie boyd, ALL evidence points to a cygwin problem.
  |
  |It is more than an opinion.  It is cold hard fact.  Sorry.
  |
  |cgf
  |
--
This is the mail archive of the cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com mailing list
for the Cygwin project.
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Re: cygwin with sockscap32
To: "'Earnie Boyd'" <cygwin at cygwin dot com>
Subject: Re: cygwin with sockscap32
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf at redhat dot com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 13:04:55 -0500
References: <878B7E94C206D511895800A0C9F4871CD5BB19 AT xcup01 DOT cup DOT hp DOT com>
<3A954C6E DOT FF247549 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Reply-To: cygwin at cygwin dot com

On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 12:29:18PM -0500, Charles S. Wilson wrote:
>"MADHU,SURESH (HP-Cupertino,ex1)" wrote:
>> >> I think its a cygnus issue. Because the sockscap code has not
changed, but
>> the cygwin code has - and the sockscap source code is not as open
source as
>> the cygnus code, 
>
>Yes.  It is and must be -- but perhaps the sockscap owners don't
>understand that.  By linking to the cygwin1.dll, the sockscap code is
>required to be open source.  If you cannot obtain the source from
>them,
>then it is because the owners are VIOLATING cygwin's license.
>
>They MUST release the code -- if they don't, I'm sure Red Hat's
>lawyers
>would love to talk with them.

Yup.

Also the fact that something "worked" before and "doesn't work" after
upgrading
cygwin does *not* automatically mean that "it's a cygwin problem".

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

References:
RE: cygwin with sockscap32
From: MADHU,SURESH (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
Re: cygwin with sockscap32
From: Charles S. Wilson
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]



--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple