Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <00869A318855D3119B3C00805F19914234E9CF@USSVML01> From: "Tiller, Jason" To: "'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" Subject: RE: 2nd Attempt: ReadLine not recognizing right key? Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 15:36:28 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain Hi, Larry, :) On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote: > At 06:12 PM 2/20/2001, Tiller, Jason wrote: > >So, I've confirmed that the right alt key (Alt Gr) doesn't generate > >META in Cygwin. > >However, I've been unable to find out exactly *how* to change the > >behavior of the Alt Gr key. All of the information I've found via > >'Net searches have involved using keymap or xmodmap or some other > >keyboard mapping tool. Is such a beast available for Cygwin? I > >get the impression from my reading that the key codes generated by > >the keyboard are hardcoded into the Cygwin DLL. > >BTW, there have been other discussions touching on this topic in > >recent years, but they've all centered on using Alt Gr to generate > >either standard bash characters ('$', '{', '[', etc.) on > >international keyboards or generate accented characters on > >U.S. keyboards. Like snowflakes, each discussion is unique, it > >seems. :) > Hm, would the use of bindings in bash be too simple an answer? > Maybe that's circular logic. I wonder... I started out with the assumption that I could use bash's bindings (~/.inputrc), but I got stuck when I realized that I have no idea how to bind an input-modifying key like AltGr (or Ctrl or Alt or any of them!). Readline binds actions to keystrokes, things like "M-f" to "forward-word" (although, perhaps tellingly, "bind -p" shows that the bound keystroke for "forward-word" is "\ef"...) , but I couldn't find anything on how to make 'M'. :) Thanks again for the input - I'm really appreciating the level of sophisticated command-line editing available with bash/readline. Even my old stand-by, 4DOS, can't come close to bash's flexibility. ---Jason -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple