Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 13:12:40 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Help!
Message-ID: <20010216131240.C13748@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <5 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 25 DOT 0 DOT 20010216111647 DOT 023b7a40 AT pop4 DOT antenna DOT nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <5.0.0.25.0.20010216111647.023b7a40@pop4.antenna.nl>; from gent@irion.nl on Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 11:36:46AM +0000

On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 11:36:46AM +0000, Joop van Gent wrote:
> Dear adressee,
> 
> I am sorry for this Subject, but we really need to draw some conclusions on 
> the following topic soon.
> 
> We are a Dutch software company that took the decision to adopt most of the 
> open source protocols, the GNU environment, because we wanted (a) to 
> support portability, particularly betwen Windows and UNIX platforms, and 
> (b) a good environment that developers feel happy with.
> 
> However, our company has to live from software sales, so we cannot deliver 
> our own source code to customers. For this reason we chose to compile with 
> Mingwin instead of Cygwin libraries after we read the license constraints 
> for Cygwin, and found out that we couldn't get the debugger (gdb) to work 
> under Windows 98/NT/2000, neither the tool we thought we could use for 
> memory leaks: MPatrol.
> 
> I am ever so willing to spend money on a good development platform with 
> support, but found out that there is no place to get that. So my main 
> question now is: is it possible to get a complete and working package of 
> software (gcc,gdb,cvs,mpatrol, etc.) on a commercial basis that allows us 
> to sell software products without having to deliver our own source code? Of 
> course we have no problem to deliver the source code that comes from the 
> GPL, it is our own software we have to protect.
> 
> Thanks in advance for your answer.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Joop van Gent
> CEO Irion Technologies BV
> http://www.irion.nl

Hello Joop,

You may redistribute the Cygwin DLL with your proprietary product when
purchasing a special license. At the bottom of the URL
	http://www.cygwin.com/licensing.html
you will find a contact address.

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple