Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: 15 Feb 2001 09:09:05 -0500 Message-ID: <20010215140905.27743.qmail@lizard.curl.com> From: Jonathan Kamens To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com In-reply-to: (message from Jesper Eskilson on 15 Feb 2001 10:27:27 +0100) Subject: Re: cygwin and GPL (again) References: <20010214232946 DOT A28167 AT redhat DOT com> <003701c0970a$cd6fd7a0$17bbca97 AT Arda> <20010215000001 DOT A28498 AT redhat DOT com> > From: Jesper Eskilson > Date: 15 Feb 2001 10:27:27 +0100 > > Christopher Faylor writes: > > > The problem is that this mailing list is becoming increasingly less > > interesting to me personally. It was actually stimulating to see people > > discussing how to speed up stat(). > > But isn't that a topic for the cygwin-developers list? After reading the descriptions of the cygwin and cygwin-developers list, I got the distinct impression that I don't belong on the cygwin-developers list. And yet I needed to have this discussion with people. I am not a cygwin developer. I don't want to be a cygwin developer. All I want to be able to do is make cygwin work as reliably and as fast as possible for my coworkers and me. If that means that occasionally I have to go digging into the source code, so be it, but that doesn't make me a cygwin developer, at least not according to the description on the Web site. jik -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple