Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.0.20010214161703.00a93d70@pop.ma.ultranet.com>
X-Sender: lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 16:17:30 -0500
To: Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
From: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners Inc)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com>
Subject: Re: 1.1.8: du reports incorrect sizes
Cc: "Javorcik, William (ITG)" <William_Javorcik AT ml DOT com>,
        "'Earnie Boyd'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <3A8AF452.A03C8F1B@ece.gatech.edu>
References: <5 DOT 0 DOT 2 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 20010214154957 DOT 00a8b7f0 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

At 04:10 PM 2/14/01, Charles Wilson wrote:
>"Larry Hall (RFK Partners Inc)" wrote:
>> 
>> I think that was Earnie's point.  The problem could be caused by the new
>> du or the new DLL.  If you would try the old du running against the new
>> DLL, this would answer the question of where the problem lies...
>
>I think the confusion here is about the new packaging system.  Packages
>such as "fileutils" are now decoupled from the core cygwin.  So, on Jan
>31, 2001, cygwin-1.1.8-2 replaced cygwin-1.1.7 as the official core
>cygwin package.  On Dec 27, 2000, cygwin-1.1.7 in turn replaced
>cygwin-1.1.6 as the official cygwin core package.
>
>Completely asynchronous to this, however, fileutils-4.0-2 replaced
>fileutils<no explicit version, based on 3.12> as the official fileutils
>binary package for the cygwin platform on Dec 18, 2000.
>
>So, it means very little to say "the fileutils from cygwin-1.1.8".  All
>that says is "I updated both cygwin-core and fileutils at some point
>after Jan 31, 2001."  The question Earnie want answered is:
>
>Did the fileutils-3.12 ---> 4.0-2 change on Dec 18, 2000 cause  the
>problem, or did the cygwin-core change on Dec 27, 2000 or Jan 31, 2001,
>or ... cause the problem?
>
>--Chuck


Thanks for the clarifying remarks.



Larry Hall                              lhall AT rfk DOT com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      http://www.rfk.com
118 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
Holliston, MA 01746                     (508) 893-9889 - FAX
                                        


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple