Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <005d01c0965e$b858bf50$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20010213134821 DOT 019a7130 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> <20010213190131 DOT 14369 DOT qmail AT lizard DOT curl DOT com> <200102131935 DOT OAA09136 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20010213194612 DOT 17311 DOT qmail AT lizard DOT curl DOT com> <200102131954 DOT OAA09284 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20010213152313 DOT A12830 AT redhat DOT com> <39319402546 DOT 20010214110838 AT logos-m DOT ru>
Subject: Re: Optimizing away "ReadFile" calls when Make calls stat()
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 19:18:25 +1100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Feb 2001 08:11:46.0629 (UTC) FILETIME=[C61D0750:01C0965D]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Egor Duda" <deo AT logos-m DOT ru>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 7:08 PM
Subject: Re: Optimizing away "ReadFile" calls when Make calls stat()


> Hi!
<SNIP>
> not  meaning to be too pushy ;), but i'd like to bring the thread
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/2000-03/msg00077.html
>
> back to life. I have to say, that not only ReadFile() is slowing things
> up,  but  CreateFile()  too.  i tend to think that cygwin- (or win32-)
> specific  parts  in  ported  applications  are  unavoidable  evil (and
> "make"   sources   are   already   full   of them).
>
<snip>
> giving  porter  a single universal tool to be more specific about what
> he  wants  to  get from stat() has one more benefit. otherwise, porter
> will  tend  to use different native win32 calls such as GetFileTime(),
> GetFileAttributes(),  GetFileSize()  etc.  which are harder to find in
> large  source  tree  when needed. with stat_lite he had just to do the
> simple grep.
>
> the  only problem with this approach i can see is that if we introduce
> new  API  and applications start to use it we became "bound" to it and
> it'll  be  not too easy to deprecate ad remove it afterwards. OTOH, we
> can  always  make stat_lite() a simple wrapper to stat() if the latter
> become fast enough.
>

Perhaps a macro for each hint, that porters who have read up on cygwin can use? Rather than change the cygwin API, have a macro that
calls GetFileTime() etc as appropriate... that way cygwin itself is not altered or tied to anything ?

Rob


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple