Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 11:48:48 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: "'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" Subject: Re: OT: sorry for bugging you .. (RE: time to download) Message-ID: <20010213114848.B10940@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: "'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: ; from Jean@mosaicsoftware.com on Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 08:50:24AM +0200 On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 08:50:24AM +0200, Jean Jordaan wrote: >Hi cgf > >> >Oh... and downloading the sitecopy source, running "./configure", then >> >running "make", then running "make install" worked fine. >> >> And, additionally, Jean, > >How do you mean, "And, additionally"? As was clear from my original >post, which you quoted with your reply, I have successfully compiled >sitecopy and am using it happily. It was also clear that something "touched a nerve" and that you were "seconding a motion" on "someone" establishing a "minimal user" and "minimal developer" platform. >> if you have other needs then think about >> CONTRIBUTING to the project rather than just sucking up > >Check out my sig. I'm a mere tech writer. I'm not a software engineer. >Cygwin and open source tools had no presence at Mosaic before I >introduced them. As far I can see, this is also contributing to the >project. Am I mistaken? Does the Cygwin project not exist to enable >many people, including non-programmers, to use these excellent tools? Contributing to a project does not necessarily mean doing low-level programming. If you are a technical writer then, oh I don't know, off the top of my head, you could, hmm... contribute some technical documentation to the project? >cgf, please don't play whack-a-mole with everyone who doesn't include >patches with each post. All I did was to try and give some feedback >on how Cygwin's being used here. I didn't demand that anyone do >anything. What I meant to convey was that I didn't expect anyone to do >anything that wasn't a priority for them. I was primarily reacting to two things 1) The notion that something had "touched a nerve" and 2) the fact that you thought there was a motion to be seconded. I am somewhat weary of people who think that they can vote for nifty things to be added to the project without even bothering to contribute anything whatsoever except opinions or sad commentaries on how things don't work. So, if you're going to read this mailing list, you're going to see me suggesting that people could contribute. And, you're also going to see the usual responses "I would, but I'm too busy" and "I would, but I am just a newbie." Both of these excuses are apparently permanent conditions. >This list is immensely helpful, and various people have succintly >told me to just put cygwin1.dll in the path, and all will be fine. >(Sinan Unur, on the sitecopy list, noted that cygintl.dll is also >necessary if sitecopy was compiled with NLS.) A couple of other >people just flamed me (actually, Michael Erdely did both :) Thanks >for the pointer, Michael). Someone, give cgf a bunch of red roses to >cheer him up! ;o) I don't recall seeing any flames here. My response was not a flame. If you think it was then you probably need a lot more cooking on the low-level heat in this mailing list before you venture out into the wider volcanic environs of usenet. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple