Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com X-Apparently-From: Message-ID: <3A8955E0.1C8E6544@yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 10:42:24 -0500 From: Earnie Boyd Reply-To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Malcolm Boekhoff CC: Cygwin News Group Subject: Re: chmod and ntsec References: <852569F1 DOT 005AA916 DOT 00 AT nyc-ntgw-n01 DOT ny DOT jpmorgan DOT com> <004901c095a5$cb7419e0$275c100a AT actfs DOT co DOT uk> <3A89409C DOT ED192DEA AT yahoo DOT com> <007101c095d1$80844730$275c100a AT actfs DOT co DOT uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Malcolm Boekhoff wrote: > > So is the definitive, expert answer to use "ntsec" or "ntsec ntea"? > The ntsec flag overrides the ntea flag IIRC. There is no reason to use the ntea flag if you use the ntsec flag. The ntea flag, IMO, should be removed in the next release as it can cause more consequence than good. Earnie. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple