Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 11:17:05 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: 1.1.8-2: TVINSERTSTRUCT & TVITEM missing Message-ID: <20010212111705.G2524@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <200102121657 DOT f1CGvN121377 AT arak DOT cs DOT hro DOT nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <200102121657.f1CGvN121377@arak.cs.hro.nl>; from ren@arak.cs.hro.nl on Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 05:57:23PM +0100 The problem with just dumping code on the mailing list is that if the license of the code does not accomodate the w32api licensing, you end up contaminating anyone who reads your post. As far as patches are concerned, I don't know what a "filesearch in .h files" means but a patch is just a "diff -up". cgf On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 05:57:23PM +0100, Ren wrote: >My god, it wouldn't hurt posting a notice about this somewhere though.. I don't remember seeing >anything about that anywhere. So instead of jumping all over me, couldn't you be nice >about my effort in trying to help you? *gagh* Besides LCC is open-sourced if I'm not >mistaken, so the 'clean-room' part should have been done on their side. > >All in all, I'm sorry if this is not helpfull, but I do think you should react differntly to a >day of blood, sweat and tears trying to get it all to run, just to help you guys. >Besides I couldn't give you a patch even if I wanted to, I only know how to do a >filesearch in .h files. -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple