Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <B7F9A3E3FDDDD11185510000F8BDBBF2049E80B1@mcdc-atl-5.cdc.gov>
X-Sybari-Space: 00000000 00000000 00000000
From: Heitzso <xxh1 AT cdc DOT gov>
To: "'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: RE: 1.1.8-2 Access violation (sshd)
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 15:07:04 -0500 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"

Please work with me slowly .... I appreciate your
note that cygwin is not linux and that an unstable
dll is not as dangerous as an unstable kernel.  I'm
learning.

I use cygwin constantly at two locations and install
it on every box I come in contact with (for cvs,
ssh, tar, etc.).  So I'm a very appreciative user.
Also I'm willing to put in some time to help the
process along, i.e. I want to give as well as take.

I would have grabbed the snapshot if I could have
easily recreated the problem.  Since the problem
didn't show back up with the original condition
but newer code I didn't take the next steop.

Please don't hesitate to say "grab the snapshot"
next time I'm in the loop -- with your emphasis
on the safety of a test I'll be more likely to
jump on it.

Heitzso

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple