Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 22:05:51 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Available for test: gcc-2.95.2-7 - libstdc++.a
Message-ID: <20010203220551.B5106@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <Pine DOT HPP DOT 3 DOT 96 DOT 1010203001422 DOT 17629I-100000 AT hp2 DOT xraylith DOT wisc DOT edu>; <20010203121718 DOT A32020 AT redhat DOT com> <3A7C352F DOT 25030 DOT 1182F8 AT localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <3A7C352F.25030.1182F8@localhost>; from pgarceau@teleport.com on Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 04:43:27PM -0800

On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 04:43:27PM -0800, Paul Garceau wrote:
>> >It was my mistake if I remember correctly. We were rushing for the
>> >first net release since Cygwin 1.0 CD, and Chris Faylor was indulging
>> >me in including my last minute fixes, and this one slipped through in
>> >the rush.
>> 
>> Nope.  This one is mine.  Earnie switched to using 'mingw' rather than
>> 'mingw32' but my build script still put things in mingw32.
>
>	Can't let any of you take the blame without chiming in...I encouraged 
>Earnie to complete the switch to using /mingw when the mingw 
>development project at Sourceforge got under way...I should have 
>mentioned it here (the Cygwin mailing list) as well since I was 
>subscribed to this list at the time but didn't due to my naivete.  
>Perhaps then the script would've been changed back when we finally got 
>the project going again,  then, none of this confusion would have come 
>up.

No, really.  It was my fault, dammit!  Mine, mine, I tell you!

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple