Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 13:22:36 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: 1.18 failed in Win 98 Message-ID: <20010131132236.E25763@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <002d01c08a7e$33ea9d60$de90718c AT cm DOT nctu DOT edu DOT tw> <20010131095226 DOT A4230 AT redhat DOT com> <3A78436C DOT 60455E AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <3A78436C.60455E@ece.gatech.edu>; from cwilson@ece.gatech.edu on Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 11:55:08AM -0500 On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 11:55:08AM -0500, Charles S. Wilson wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >> >> I did set the heap chunk size to 1GB in 1.1.8. >> >> I haven't officially announced this yet, are you people just polling sources.redhat.com >> or something? I guess this explains why the bandwidth is always pegged there. > >No, 1.1.8-1 has made it to the mirrors. I ran setup to update to gcc-7 >to help test *that* -- and noticed that 1.1.8 was there. I *knew* it >was also a test release (since I read cygwin-developers) -- and wanted >to help test it. It wasn't a test release. I was waiting for it to show up on a few more mirrors before I announced it. My astonishment is that half a dozen people would notice this so quickly. That leads me to believe that people are updating frequently. Given that the cygwin downloads on sources.redhat.com are always quite high, I imagine that people are downloading directly despite my frequent requests not to do this. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple