Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
X-Authentication-Warning: hp2.xraylith.wisc.edu: khan owned process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:21:39 -0600 (CST)
From: Mumit Khan <khan AT NanoTech DOT Wisc DOT EDU>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: -mno-cygwin and c++ stl... progress?
In-Reply-To: <20010130163440.A24655@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.HPP.3.96.1010130162051.2988N-100000@hp2.xraylith.wisc.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> I was actually thinking of the pragmatic solution of checking in a
> libstdc++.a file into the mingw repository and releasing that along with
> the mingw stuff.  I assume that libstdc++.a would be produced by a true
> mingw gcc.

Now, that's much better. I would of course then like to see mingw libgcc.a
included as well, unless we can reasonably guarantee that it won't be 
needed.

Mumit



--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple