Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 10:34:57 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin Subject: Re: ncftp - works, but doesn't display any prompts Message-ID: <20010125103457.B29828@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin References: <3A6F78D8 DOT CBEA38E9 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20010125160909 DOT A1058 AT cobold DOT vinschen DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <20010125160909.A1058@cobold.vinschen.de>; from cygwin@cygwin.com on Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 04:09:09PM +0100 On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 04:09:09PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 07:52:40PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: >> This is a bug in ncftp or cygwin. If ncftp determines that it is not >> running from a TTY, it doesn't print any prompts. Here's the code that >> it uses to determine that (ncftp/main.c): >> >> gIsTTY = ((isatty(2) != 0) && (getppid() > 1)) ? 1 : 0; >> gIsTTYr = ((isatty(0) != 0) && (getppid() > 1)) ? 1 : 0; >> >> Here's the result of those operations in a bash window: >> isatty(2) = 1 >> isatty(0) = 1 >> getppid() = 1764 >> gIsTTY = 1 >> gIsTTYr = 1 >> >> And from a cmd prompt: >> isatty(2) = 1 >> isatty(0) = 1 >> getppid() = 1 >> gIsTTY = 0 >> gIsTTYr = 0 >> >> I'm not sure what the right fix is. Options: >> 1) Is this really a problem with the getppid implementation of cygwin >> (?) >> 2) patch ncftp to ignore the value of getppid() -- just use isatty(x) >> --> #ifdef __CYGWIN__, or for all platforms? Why does ncftp test >> getppid() anyway? > >1) "No" from my point of view. A processes parent is set to PID 1 if > it's parent process isn't known by Cygwin - eg. is a native Windows > process. Windows is treated being `init'. > >2) That's the solution I would prefer. The check is senseless under > Cygwin. Actually, I think it is pretty senseless in general. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple