Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com X-Apparently-From: Message-ID: <3A6EE3EE.6F18444@yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 09:17:18 -0500 From: Earnie Boyd Reply-To: Earnie Boyd X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: L Anderson CC: cygwin Subject: Re: 1.1.7:mount and ls problem References: <3A6E25E8 DOT 63091A22 AT mvseac DOT com> <3A6E3D52 DOT A697CA49 AT yahoo DOT com> <3A6E8A4D DOT 30461468 AT mvseac DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit L Anderson wrote: > > Hi Earnie, > > Thanks for your reply. I have commented below: > > Earnie Boyd wrote: > > > > L Anderson wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Being new to Cygwin, I searched the faq and mail archives but could find > > > no answer to my question. An answer would be appreciated. > > > > > > I'm running Win98 and Cygwin 1.1.7. > > > > > > I have drives ... e:, f:, g: ... on win98. I installed cygwin on g:. I > > > fire up cygwin and do: > > > cd / > > > mkdir e > > > mount e: /e > > > All is well -- e shows up in both an ls ( as e) and mount (as e: /e). > > > > > > Now I do: > > > mount f: /f > > > I get the error: > > > mount: warning - /f does not exist > > > but mount shows > > > f: f/ . . . > > > and ls doesn't show f. > > > > Note: it says warning, it doesn't say error. The non-list would be the > > reason for the warning. IMO, it's probably time to make it an error. > > > > Ah! Since it says "warning", the "principle of least astonishment" > should not have been violated and therefore, the software should have > acted consistent with my first example, i.e., have done a "mkdir f" > before doing the "mount f: f/"? > > At this point, I don't know what you mean by "non-list", so I can't > comment. > I was in reference to your complaint that `ls' doesn't show it. > Based on the "side effects" of the command sequence, I agree. The > software should have "done it right" or only issued an error message > that said, effectively, "Hey dude, create the damn directory before you > do a mount! Don't leave it up to me!" :-) > > > > > > > > > > If I do an ls f, all the files under f:'s root are listed. > > > > > > > > If I do mkdir f, I get: > > > mkdir: cannot make directory `f': File exists > > > > > > > Yes, another reason for the warning. You can either umount /f and then do > > the mkdir /f and mount f:/ /f or you can mkdir /cygdrive/c/cygwin/f > > assuming / is pointed at c:/cygwin > > > > I figured this out but it still doesn't answer why the directory for f > (mount point) looks like any other directory but doesn't show up in an > "ls" in the root? > > > > > > > So where is f hiding except in the mount table? > > > > > > > The mount table, in the windows registry. > > > > This confirms what I expected but why doesn't "f" show up in an "ls" in > the root (/)? > Uh, ls doesn't show it because ls is displaying the contents of the disk and it doesn't reside on the disk. > > > > > > Why does f seem to work like any other directory (I can cd to it or its > > > subdirs and ls their contents) but not show up in an ls at the root? > > > > > > Is this a bug or a feature? > > > > > > > It's a feature with old history. > > > > Sounds like the code needs a good "slap side da head"! Unfortunately, > I'm not there yet. Is it a problem with "mount", "ls", "cygwinxxx.dll", > or ...? > Yep. It would be mount. See src/winsup/utils/mount.cc > Thanks for your help! > You're welcome, Earnie > Lowell Anderson > _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple