Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
X-Mailer: 21.2  (beta41) "Polyhymnia" XEmacs Lucid (via feedmail 8 I)
To: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com>
Cc: Daniel Barclay <Daniel DOT Barclay AT digitalfocus DOT com>,
        ehud AT unix DOT simonwiesel DOT co DOT il, cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject: Re: NTEmacs shell/CygWin: should control-C work?
References: <3A5F5F1C DOT 3879B2CF AT digitalfocus DOT com>
	<3A5E32A6 DOT 557FEAE7 AT digitalfocus DOT com> <uyg0ip3ddt DOT fsf AT tcsi DOT com>
	<3A5F5F1C DOT 3879B2CF AT digitalfocus DOT com>
	<4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20010112164936 DOT 022cabc8 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com>
	<4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20010116141835 DOT 026d2cb0 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com>
	<4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20010118112140 DOT 026d70b0 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com>
X-Face: I-*}xvwusAv%MlABo'jVNP7TDXf5bb*L[q,r{DnsR1GoL07^Wf)sAu%>!LjXAFlZZN+`OQu
	}?#du]C)[*%ERKR#+l#sX'EoNbSO~|.x AT ogoS5|"-u?<s5ViLslvYMlj7_n!Tq1m AT xt2Bhj4[Zg+e?
	/Yy\SE`V?%v~kRU3GoS1f&U]}
From: "Dr. Volker Zell" <Dr DOT Volker DOT Zell AT oracle DOT com>
Date: 19 Jan 2001 01:48:37 +0100
In-Reply-To: "Larry Hall's message of "Thu, 18 Jan 2001 11:22:56 -0500"
Message-ID: <kvg0igjriy.fsf@vzell.de.oracle.com>
Lines: 40
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.2 (Polyhymnia)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

>>>>> "RFK" == RFK Partners, Inc <Larry> writes:

    RFK> At 11:22 AM 1/18/2001, Daniel Barclay wrote:
    >> "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" wrote:
    >> > 
    >> > At 02:15 PM 1/16/2001, Daniel Barclay wrote:
    >> > >"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" wrote:
    >> > > >
    >> > >...
    >> > > > ... However,
    >> > > > I can say you'll have better luck with a Cygwin version of Emacs, like
    >> > > > XEmacs.  You'll find Cygwin applications work much better with other
    >> > > > Cygwin applications, especially in areas of detail like this.
    >> > >
    >> > >How different is XEmacs from GNU/NTEmacs?
    >> > >
    >> > >(I don't do much (any) Lisp programming, so I guess I'm just asking about
    >> > >default configuration and about compatibility of add-ons like JDE.)
    >> > 
    >> > Sorry, I was a little unclear.  AFAIK, there is a Cygwin version of XEmacs
    >> > but there isn't one for NTEmacs.  My main point was that signal functionality
    >> > can be handled by Cygwin (and is) or by the O/S.  However, the signal coming
    >> > from a Win32 app doesn't get the same response out of Cygwin as one coming
    >> > from a Cygwin app.  If you have problems in this area, your best bet is to
    >> > use Cygwin-enabled versions of apps when available.
    >> 
    >> I just meant how different is XEmacs from NTEmacs to the user?  If I switch 
    >> from NTEmacs (which I'm used to) to XEmacs (which I don't know), how big a 
    >> change is that likely to been (from the Emacs user point of view)?


    RFK> I, of course, am not qualified to answer that question since I don't use
    RFK> Emacs at all.  Others might be able to help.  You may be better off asking
    RFK> this question on some Emacs list though...

I've done the switch a long time ago. NO big deal.
Just switch of the toolbar and it feels like Emacs.

Ciao
  Volker


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple