Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 20:04:43 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: /bin/pwd versus built-in pwd
Message-ID: <20010116200443.A10173@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <OFF186A1CB DOT 218CF568-ON862569D6 DOT 0076B70D AT RCHLAND DOT IBM DOT COM> <3A64D197 DOT 514DD0FA AT veritas DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <3A64D197.514DD0FA@veritas.com>; from rmcgowan@veritas.com on Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 02:56:23PM -0800

On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 02:56:23PM -0800, Bob McGowan wrote:
>Based on the man page for 'pwd':
>
> "...That is, all components of the printed name will be actual
>  directory names -- none will be symbolic links."
>
>I'd say this is a bug.

I'd say that this has been discussed in the mailing list several times
already.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple