Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <3A649DDE.8E4CDA18@digitalfocus.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 14:15:42 -0500
From: Daniel Barclay <Daniel DOT Barclay AT digitalfocus DOT com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com>
CC: ehud AT unix DOT simonwiesel DOT co DOT il, cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject: Re: NTEmacs shell/CygWin: should control-C work?
References: <3A5F5F1C DOT 3879B2CF AT digitalfocus DOT com>
	 <3A5E32A6 DOT 557FEAE7 AT digitalfocus DOT com>
	 <uyg0ip3ddt DOT fsf AT tcsi DOT com>
	 <3A5F5F1C DOT 3879B2CF AT digitalfocus DOT com> <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20010112164936 DOT 022cabc8 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" wrote:
> 
...
> ... However,
> I can say you'll have better luck with a Cygwin version of Emacs, like
> XEmacs.  You'll find Cygwin applications work much better with other
> Cygwin applications, especially in areas of detail like this.

How different is XEmacs from GNU/NTEmacs?  

(I don't do much (any) Lisp programming, so I guess I'm just asking about 
default configuration and about compatibility of add-ons like JDE.)

Thanks,
Daniel
-- 
Daniel Barclay
Digital Focus
Daniel DOT Barclay AT digitalfocus DOT com

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple