Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-Id: <4.3.1.2.20010115135445.022266d8@pop.ma.ultranet.com> X-Sender: lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1 Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 14:03:56 -0500 To: Earnie Boyd From: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" Subject: Re: Running .bat files from CYGWIN Cc: Michael Yorg In-Reply-To: <3A634686.A775FD84@yahoo.com> References: <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20010115124313 DOT 023299b8 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 01:50 PM 1/15/2001, Earnie Boyd wrote: >"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" wrote: > > > > At 12:43 PM 1/15/2001, Michael Yorg wrote: > > >I have read that CYGWIN supports running DOS .bat files but the shell seems > > >the think that they aren't executable. The exact error is, 'command not > > >found'. I've used chmod to give the file executable status and it still > > >won't work. Someone recommended running the .bat file from within a shell > > >script and that didn't seem to work either. What am I doing wrong? > > > > Check the mail list archive for discussions on this. You should be able to > > execute batch files by invoking the command interpreter (i.e. "cmd /c b.bat" > > on NT/W2K). sh (ash) or bash won't know what to do with these files > > otherwise, even if it did read them... > > > >Create a noop program named #!.exe and put it in command.com/cmd.exe >PATH. >Then at the top of your .bat file put > #! c:\\path\\to\\cmd.exe /c >and this will cause Cygwin to think it's executable and execute it. > >Cheers, >Earnie. Right but these batch files won't run from cmd.exe/command.com like this though. Still, its a way to "convert" batch files to run under the Cygwin shells if you don't need them to run under cmd.exe/command.com anymore. The reason I directed the poster to the email archives is I seem to remember that there was also some way to get bash/sh to run batch files directly, without invoking the cmd.exe/command.com explicitly (i.e. one could just type b.bat at the sh/bash prompt). I don't remember the details though (which is the part that would be in the email archives for those interested in looking!;-)) And actually, for me, this works. YMMV and don't ask me why it works for me!;-) Larry Hall lhall AT rfk DOT com RFK Partners, Inc. http://www.rfk.com 118 Washington Street (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office Holliston, MA 01746 (508) 893-9889 - FAX -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple