Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-Id: <4.3.1.2.20010112164936.022cabc8@pop.ma.ultranet.com> X-Sender: lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1 Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 16:53:27 -0500 To: ehud AT unix DOT simonwiesel DOT co DOT il, cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com From: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" Subject: Re: NTEmacs shell/CygWin: should control-C work? In-Reply-To: <200101122125.XAA16707@linux.> References: <3A5F5F1C DOT 3879B2CF AT digitalfocus DOT com> <3A5E32A6 DOT 557FEAE7 AT digitalfocus DOT com> <3A5F5F1C DOT 3879B2CF AT digitalfocus DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 04:25 PM 1/12/2001, Ehud Karni wrote: >On Fri, 12 Jan 2001 14:46:36 -0500, Daniel Barclay wrote: > > > > "David M. Karr" wrote: > > > > > > Daniel> In a shell buffer in NTEmacs configured per the shell-setup instructions > > > Daniel> in the CygWin FAQ at http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin/faq/faq.html#SEC5, > > > Daniel> control-C doesn't seem to work. > > ... > > > This bites me several times a day. It is a known problem... > > > > Do you mean it's a known problem that crops up (for some people), or that > > it simply doesn't work at all (for anyone combining Emacs and CygWin)? > >I think he meant it is a general problem for everyone. The base of this >is that the emacs shell buffer is not a tty. You can check it by doing >`stty', you'll get: "stty: standard input: Not a character device". > >And hence, it is not a tty ==> it will not generate SIGINT for ^C. > >Ehud. Forgive me for coming late to the party. I didn't digest that this conversation was about NTEmacs (i.e. the Windows port). I'll leave aside whether or not ^C should work in this context. I really don't know whether it should/would/ever did. I don't use Emacs. However, I can say you'll have better luck with a Cygwin version of Emacs, like XEmacs. You'll find Cygwin applications work much better with other Cygwin applications, especially in areas of detail like this. YMMV. Void where prohibited. Larry Hall lhall AT rfk DOT com RFK Partners, Inc. http://www.rfk.com 118 Washington Street (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office Holliston, MA 01746 (508) 893-9889 - FAX -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple