Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 10:44:20 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: "The PATH problem"
Message-ID: <20010112104420.A8777@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <3A5F15A2 DOT F8D56ABC AT yahoo DOT com> <3A5E927F DOT 7009 DOT 7C9D21F AT localhost> <3A5F15A2 DOT F8D56ABC AT yahoo DOT com> <20010112095045 DOT F8279 AT redhat DOT com> <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20010112102902 DOT 0226c948 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <4.3.1.2.20010112102902.0226c948@pop.ma.ultranet.com>; from lhall@rfk.com on Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 10:31:13AM -0500

On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 10:31:13AM -0500, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote:
>At 09:50 AM 1/12/2001, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>What kind of UNIX emulation would Cygwin be if you couldn't modify your
>>PATH???
>
>
>This is clearly a rhetorical question but in case anyone isn't sure, the 
>answer to the question is "a bad one", which Cygwin certainly is NOT.
>
>(...now back to modifying my path from bash...;-))

Phew.  I wasn't sure.  Thanks for clarifying this issue.  :-)

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple