Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <3A5CDEA3.CAB59B71@ece.gatech.edu>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 17:13:55 -0500
From: Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.7 sun4u)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: avadekar AT certicom DOT com
CC: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject: Re: make -mno-win32 the gcc default?
References: <20010110163107 DOT A4979 AT redhat DOT com> <3A5CDA12 DOT B7533F6C AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20010110170527 DOT B21342 AT volta DOT certicom DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Sure.  'export CC="gcc -mwin32"' and 'export CXX="g++ -mwin32"' in your
.bashrc

--Chuck


Ashok Vadekar wrote:
> 
> Could the switch be controlled by a $CYGWIN keyword?  Then both modes could
> be considered default wrt. the command line.  You would merely have to decide
> how you wanted cygwin (make, really) to behave.
> 
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 04:54:26PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
> > Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > >
> > > Earnie has been proposing this and I sort of like the idea but dread the
> > > potential hue and cry that could result.
> > >
> >
> > I also like the idea, but am terrified of the torrent of "It worked with
> > gcc-2.95.2 and cygwin beta 1.1 [sic]" complaints.  Also I'm not sure
> > that all of "my" packages are _WIN32 clean.  (For the most part, if they
> > compiled -- I was happy.  I didn't look too closely beyond that.  I know
> > that zlib and libpng are WIN32 clean 'cause I tested them with
> > -mno-win32.  Dunno *for sure* about the rest).
> >
> > > So, is the hue and cry from the lack of WIN32 counterbalanced by potentially
> > > easier UNIX porting?
> >
> > Ummm....yyyyeeessss....I think????
> >
> > --Chuck
> >
> > --
> > Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> > Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple