Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 17:02:16 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: make -mno-win32 the gcc default? Message-ID: <20010110170216.A5249@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20010110163107 DOT A4979 AT redhat DOT com> <3A5CDA12 DOT B7533F6C AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <3A5CDA12.B7533F6C@ece.gatech.edu>; from cwilson@ece.gatech.edu on Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 04:54:26PM -0500 On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 04:54:26PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >> >> Earnie has been proposing this and I sort of like the idea but dread the >> potential hue and cry that could result. >> > >I also like the idea, but am terrified of the torrent of "It worked with >gcc-2.95.2 and cygwin beta 1.1 [sic]" complaints. Also I'm not sure >that all of "my" packages are _WIN32 clean. (For the most part, if they >compiled -- I was happy. I didn't look too closely beyond that. I know >that zlib and libpng are WIN32 clean 'cause I tested them with >-mno-win32. Dunno *for sure* about the rest). > >> So, is the hue and cry from the lack of WIN32 counterbalanced by potentially >> easier UNIX porting? > >Ummm....yyyyeeessss....I think???? My sentiments exactly. We could always make a release, see who complained, and then change it back if it seemed like a bad idea. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple