Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
X-Apparently-From: <earnie?boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Message-ID: <3A5B7D5C.4B07B0FE@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2001 16:06:37 -0500
From: Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.171 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Corinna Vinschen <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: learn to email
References: <852569CF DOT 007B4423 DOT 00 AT nyc-ntgw-n01 DOT ny DOT jpmorgan DOT com> <20010110002903 DOT J4141 AT cobold DOT vinschen DOT de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Corinna Vinschen wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 05:26:26PM -0500, Noel L Yap wrote:
> > When replying to an email list, the replyer cannot assume that the replyee is on
> > the email list (and therefore will get duplicates).  Neither can list members
> > remeber who is on the list and who is not.  Getting duplicates when on an email
> > list is a fact of life, deal with it yourself; don't ask others to deal with it
> > for you.
>
> While I don't like the way Tom used to say this I think we all would
> have an advantage if everyone would care a little bit for his/her
> mail recipients. The default case should be to send a reply only to
> the list except when one explicitly says "I'm not on the list".
>

Well, Chris could modify the server rules to do that.  But, I don't think it wise.
I'm on several lists and those that don't put Reply-to headers for you always send to
all parties regardless.  Open lists such as cygwin AT cygwin DOT com warrants a Reply-all.
You never know when you might lose a non-member in the thread by someone removing
that address undesireably.  They also all suggest that it is the recipient's problem
to deal with the duplicates by filtering.

>
> And btw. I would like to ask again for shortening a reply to it's
> relevant parts instead of sending the whole message of the original
> sender again and again.
>

Yes, especially, it isn't necessary to quote the entire cygcheck output.


>
> Everyone aware of netiquette rule 4?
> http://www.albion.com/netiquette/book/0963702513p39.html
>

Uh, oh, watch out, Ann Landers is on the list ;^).

Cheers,
Earnie.


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple