Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 12:09:04 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin 1.1.7 Message-ID: <20010108120904.A31379@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <229D7C0FE0BED311A0E800805F0DD47176C8D0 AT wn01ex DOT wn DOT gb DOT solvay .com> <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20010108115504 DOT 01d5ce30 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <4.3.1.2.20010108115504.01d5ce30@pop.ma.ultranet.com>; from lhall@rfk.com on Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 11:56:09AM -0500 On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 11:56:09AM -0500, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote: >At 11:54 AM 1/8/2001, Craveiro, Marco wrote: >>Well, I've just upgraded from B20 to the latest cygwin with the >>graphical installer and I *have* to say this: cygwin rocks! Its fast, >>its stable, and its more and more like having a full featured UNIX in >>windows. A big thanks to everyone involved in this project. > >Nice to hear a good word now and again!;-) I'm sure the contributors to >Cygwin appreciate your comments. Well, I definitely do! I always approach email with a subject like "cygwin 1.1.7" with some trepidation since it is usually a complaint from someone who has selectively installed random pieces of the complete cygwin installation and is perplexed as to why they are getting "command not found" errors. So, I very much appreciated the unadulterated appreciation. :-) cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple