Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 10:28:17 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [BUG] GCC specs ignored [WAS: Re: perl-5.6.1 DB_file support] Message-ID: <20010108102817.A27824@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <3A5605B3 DOT AAC25D7F AT sbox DOT tu-graz DOT ac DOT at> <3A59255F DOT 85918DE8 AT sbox DOT tu-graz DOT ac DOT at> <3A5966E5 DOT 735999FE AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3A59C529 DOT 4342E4D4 AT yahoo DOT com> <3A59CEBF DOT FFC6B476 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3A59D593 DOT 32643717 AT yahoo DOT com> <20010108100138 DOT G26292 AT redhat DOT com> <3A59DB99 DOT 939BED59 AT yahoo DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <3A59DB99.939BED59@yahoo.com>; from earnie_boyd@yahoo.com on Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 10:24:09AM -0500 On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 10:24:09AM -0500, Earnie Boyd wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >>If you are saying that gcc is somehow ignoring the specs file, then that >>is a bug. > >Yes, I changed -mno-win32 to -mwin32 and received an error message from >one of the subprocesses, I don't remember now if it was cpp or cc1, that >it was an invalid switch. Ok. Nevermind. It makes sense since -mwin32 has never been a valid switch. You can't create new switches in the specs file, apparently. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple