Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
X-Apparently-From: <earnie?boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Message-ID: <3A59D593.32643717@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2001 09:58:27 -0500
From: Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Charles S. Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
CC: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject: Re: perl-5.6.1 DB_file support
References: <3A5605B3 DOT AAC25D7F AT sbox DOT tu-graz DOT ac DOT at> <3A59255F DOT 85918DE8 AT sbox DOT tu-graz DOT ac DOT at> <3A5966E5 DOT 735999FE AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3A59C529 DOT 4342E4D4 AT yahoo DOT com> <3A59CEBF DOT FFC6B476 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

"Charles S. Wilson" wrote:
> 
> Earnie Boyd wrote:
> >
> > "Charles S. Wilson" wrote:
> > > #if defined(_WIN32) || defined(__CYGWIN__)
> > >
> > > To accommodate *bad* ports, cygwin's gcc used to define _WIN32, but that
> > > behavior will be dropped soon IIRC.
> >
> > Where did you get that piece of information or are you dreaming?
> > Although I would wholeheartedly support such a move, I don't think that
> > the Cygwin's commercial client list would be that happy about such a
> > move.
> 
> That was my recollection of comments made on the list several months ago
> (perhaps even a far as a year?  Maybe even pre-departure-of-Mumit).
> Basically, that "Eventually we want to do X..." kinda thing.  This
> 'vague recollection' has been reinforced by several recent emails from
> you, Earnie, where you recommended using '-mno-win32'.  I assummed that
> was because the change I vaguely recalled would soon go into effect.
> 
> Perhaps I misinterpreted, and your advice about '-mno-win32' was in
> response to the defeat of the notion to remove '-D_WIN32' from the
> cygwin gcc specs.
> 

As I said, I would support wholeheartedly such a change, however Chris
Faylor and Red Hat would have the final say.  I do think that the WIN32
definitions get in the way of porting UNIX code to Cygwin especially
when Win32 porting is already existing in the code.  I do modify my own
specs file to exclude the WIN32 defines by default and change the
-mno-win32 to -mwin32 however with gcc-2.95.2-6 I had to binary edit
cc1.exe (or was it cpp.exe) to complete this.

Cheers,
Earnie.

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple