Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <3A45A37A.3FE27671@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2000 02:19:22 -0500 From: Charles Wilson X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: s_c_biggs AT bigfoot DOT com CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Perl/DB Request for suggestions... References: <3A44E059 DOT 30974 DOT ADDDA AT localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit No, Perl doesn't *need* the berkeley DB package. Berk-DB is an optional dependency; if have Berk-db, then make-perl will build the DB_File module. If you do not have Berk-DB, then perl will just build everything else, and NOT the DB_File module. No problems. Better, you can always go back later, and build DB_File by itself (not as part of the make-perl process) if you later discover that you need that functionality. --Chuck "Stephen C. Biggs" wrote: > > Perl 5.6.0 seems to need the Berkeley DB package, albeit version 1 seems to > suffice... but the Berkeley DB package needs Perl... thus a circular > dependency: build the DB version 1 package, install; build Perl, install; > then build the DB 3 package using the just installed Perl, install the DB3 > package; then build Perl and install it with the DB3 support; then build > and install DB3 again with the new Perl? After that, build and install the > Perl package? Ad infinitum... Where should I stop building? > > -- > Want to unsubscribe from this list? > Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple