Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 12:28:17 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: CVS permissions problem with network drive
Message-ID: <20001219122817.A8827@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <OF4452111B DOT B0F21FC3-ON862569B2 DOT 00610F4F AT mmm DOT com> <013901c06960$9ff3dd30$ad9560cb AT workhorse> <20001218214202 DOT A5253 AT redhat DOT com> <0012191352330A DOT 28008 AT cygbert> <20001219111041 DOT A8423 AT redhat DOT com> <3A3F911D DOT 5CBF4066 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <3A3F911D.5CBF4066@ece.gatech.edu>; from cwilson@ece.gatech.edu on Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 11:47:25AM -0500

On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 11:47:25AM -0500, Charles S. Wilson wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>Actually, shouldn't this be a mount option rather than a cygwin
>>setting?  In fact, maybe a
>>
>>mount -n c:\foo /foo    # use NTSEC semantics
>>
>>would be sort of nice.
>
>Yes, it would.  But, how would
>
>cp foo //bar/baz
>
>be handled?

It would use the default or we could still use a CYGWIN environment
variable.

I just tried doing a 'mount //foo/bar //foo/bar' but that didn't work.

>Besides, this is something you'd configure one way or the other for all
>SMB shares -- either you're a domain user or you're not.  So, it
>probably shouldn't be set on a per-share or per-mount basis, but rather
>it should be set globally for a particular user/installation.

Isn't it possible that you could have different shares mounted from
different systems with different requirements?  That's why I was
suggesting a mount option.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple