Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 11:10:41 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: CVS permissions problem with network drive
Message-ID: <20001219111041.A8423@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <OF4452111B DOT B0F21FC3-ON862569B2 DOT 00610F4F AT mmm DOT com> <013901c06960$9ff3dd30$ad9560cb AT workhorse> <20001218214202 DOT A5253 AT redhat DOT com> <0012191352330A DOT 28008 AT cygbert>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <0012191352330A.28008@cygbert>; from cygwin@cygwin.com on Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 01:52:33PM +0100

On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 01:52:33PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Tuesday 19 December 2000 03:42, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 03:08:45PM +1300, Robert Collins wrote:
>> >----- Original Message -----
>> >From: "Charles S. Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
>> >To: "Corinna Vinschen" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
>> >
>> >> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Sounds reasonable to me.  CYGWIN=smbfakeperm ?  CYGWIN=nodomain ?
>> >
>> >CYGWIN=SMBisBroken ?
>>
>> CYGWIN=ilikepie ?
>>
>> Nah.  Too much of a possibility of misinterpretation.
>
>I know, this is somewhat dry but I have decided to use [no]smbntsec.
>
>What I'm curious about is what do you think should be the default?
>Personally I would prefer to have smbntsec off by default but to
>have it on by default would match the current behaviour.
>
>Opinions?

Actually, shouldn't this be a mount option rather than a cygwin setting?
In fact, maybe a

mount -n c:\foo /foo	# use NTSEC semantics

would be sort of nice.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple