Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com From: Corinna Vinschen Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 13:52:33 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.1.99] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <013901c06960$9ff3dd30$ad9560cb AT workhorse> <20001218214202 DOT A5253 AT redhat DOT com> In-Reply-To: <20001218214202.A5253@redhat.com> Subject: Re: CVS permissions problem with network drive MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0012191352330A.28008@cygbert> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id HAA22105 On Tuesday 19 December 2000 03:42, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 03:08:45PM +1300, Robert Collins wrote: > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Charles S. Wilson" > >To: "Corinna Vinschen" > > > >> Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >> > >> > >> Sounds reasonable to me. CYGWIN=smbfakeperm ? CYGWIN=nodomain ? > > > >CYGWIN=SMBisBroken ? > > CYGWIN=ilikepie ? > > Nah. Too much of a possibility of misinterpretation. I know, this is somewhat dry but I have decided to use [no]smbntsec. What I'm curious about is what do you think should be the default? Personally I would prefer to have smbntsec off by default but to have it on by default would match the current behaviour. Opinions? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc. -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple