Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.0.20001218200909.009fc880@bastion.datatask.com.au> X-Sender: ev AT bastion DOT datatask DOT com DOT au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 20:28:03 +1100 To: cygwin From: Evan McLean Subject: Re: Bogus hostname forcing in RedHat source RPMS Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed On Sun, 17 Dec 2000 18:36:25 -0800, Stephen C. Biggs wrote: >Why can't cygwin be Unix?? How much windows programming have you done? :-) Perhaps the statement "Cygwin is not Unix" could be more accurately expanded to "Cygwin is a close to a Unix-like environment that is possible under Microsoft Windows, but no more so." As a reasonably seasoned programmer on both, I find the Cygwin developers' (of which I am not one) success in inveigling windows rather impressive. (Not to mention their patience on the mailing lists, which I personally find remarkably impressive.) And if that is not enough, consider the following quote (source unknown): "You can't let people get away with shoddy service. It starts with overcooked meat and ends with Microsoft." E. (Trying to help put things in perspective.) -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple