Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com From: Corinna Vinschen Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 13:13:20 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.1.99] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20001217050647 DOT 6558 DOT qmail AT web114 DOT yahoomail DOT com> <20001217000924 DOT A10003 AT redhat DOT com> In-Reply-To: <20001217000924.A10003@redhat.com> Subject: Re: delete old version? MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0012171313200P.00473@cygbert> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id HAA18517 On Sunday 17 December 2000 06:09, you wrote: > On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 09:06:47PM -0800, Earnie Boyd wrote: > >--- DJ Delorie wrote: > >> > The only thing I can see objectionable would be the time limit > >> > for source distribution; but, you would know better about that > >> > than I would. > >> > >> There is no minimum time limit when you distribute the source with > >> the binary. See GPL 3a. You're thinking of GPL 3b, which > >> requires a *written* promise. We can't do that with FTP. > >> > >> If they didn't get the source when they downloaded the binary, we > >> have no further obligations to them. > > > >Ah, yes. Then I suggest removal of the old directory as people > > really should upgrade if they want help. > > Strong ditto. > > I'd like to get rid of the B20 and B19 stuff in this process as well. > I'll archive them somewhere but I would rather not keep them around > as there still seems to be a lot of confusion about B20. Yes, trash it. Corinna -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com