Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 12:35:37 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Cc: s_kelem AT pacbell DOT net
Subject: Re: latest version of gcc?
Message-ID: <20001216123537.A31046@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>, s_kelem AT pacbell DOT net
References: <3A3BA5BF DOT 5080009 AT pacbell DOT net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <3A3BA5BF.5080009@pacbell.net>; from s_kelem@pacbell.net on Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 09:26:23AM -0800

On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 09:26:23AM -0800, Steve Kelem wrote:
>I looked around the cygwin site and couldn't find an obvious answer to 
>this question....
>
>What's the latest version of gcc that I should be using with the latest 
>cygwin (1.1.6)?
>
>The Cygwin page has a "more software" link that points to gcc.2.95.2
>that was built in 1999.  Is that the latest one that I should be using?

I don't understand the question.  We include a version of gcc when you
install cygwin.  Why would you assume that this version was incorrect?

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com