Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 12:35:37 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin Cc: s_kelem AT pacbell DOT net Subject: Re: latest version of gcc? Message-ID: <20001216123537.A31046@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin , s_kelem AT pacbell DOT net References: <3A3BA5BF DOT 5080009 AT pacbell DOT net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <3A3BA5BF.5080009@pacbell.net>; from s_kelem@pacbell.net on Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 09:26:23AM -0800 On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 09:26:23AM -0800, Steve Kelem wrote: >I looked around the cygwin site and couldn't find an obvious answer to >this question.... > >What's the latest version of gcc that I should be using with the latest >cygwin (1.1.6)? > >The Cygwin page has a "more software" link that points to gcc.2.95.2 >that was built in 1999. Is that the latest one that I should be using? I don't understand the question. We include a version of gcc when you install cygwin. Why would you assume that this version was incorrect? cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com