Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.0.20001212012027.02cd5a30@pop.bresnanlink.net> X-Sender: cabbey AT pop DOT bresnanlink DOT net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0 Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 01:23:41 -0600 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Chris Abbey Subject: Re: [long] Re: signals? In-Reply-To: <20001212020549.A29632@redhat.com> References: <5 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 25 DOT 0 DOT 20001211233737 DOT 02885010 AT pop DOT bresnanlink DOT net> <5 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 25 DOT 0 DOT 20001211202412 DOT 02930eb0 AT pop DOT bresnanlink DOT net> <4 DOT 3 DOT 2 DOT 7 DOT 0 DOT 20001113000139 DOT 00c3ba60 AT pop DOT bresnanlink DOT net> <4 DOT 3 DOT 2 DOT 7 DOT 0 DOT 20001001212519 DOT 00c09bb0 AT pop> <4 DOT 3 DOT 2 DOT 7 DOT 0 DOT 20001001212519 DOT 00c09bb0 AT pop> <20001002114023 DOT H13304 AT cygnus DOT com> <4 DOT 3 DOT 2 DOT 7 DOT 0 DOT 20001113000139 DOT 00c3ba60 AT pop DOT bresnanlink DOT net> <20001113115655 DOT J7424 AT redhat DOT com> <5 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 25 DOT 0 DOT 20001211202412 DOT 02930eb0 AT pop DOT bresnanlink DOT net> <20001212002741 DOT D22048 AT redhat DOT com> <5 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 25 DOT 0 DOT 20001211233737 DOT 02885010 AT pop DOT bresnanlink DOT net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed At 02:05 12/12/00 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 12:54:02AM -0600, Chris Abbey wrote: > >At 00:27 12/12/00 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >>On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 11:21:05PM -0600, Chris Abbey wrote: > >> >At 11:56 11/13/00 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> >>Dunno. Probably, you're sending more than one CTRL-BREAK. It works > >> >>fine for me. > >> >> > >> >>cgf > >> > > >> >ok, I'd ask that you (and anyone else with a couple minutes) humor me > >> > >>If the "you" here is me, then I respectfully decline. > > > >it was, (the parenthetical was for anyone else) primarily because > >you claim this works for you, and I see no way in hell it can. > >I respectfully deduce then that you claim "wfm" without actually > >having ever tried it... > >Now you're just being insulting. That wasn't the intention, it is a perfectly logical deduction. My apologies if I've offended, which clearly I have. >I guess I will stop reading this thread now. > >Bye, bye, I hope not, as the latter portions of the note, which I fear you've not read, were the type of information you asked for... namely what's happening in cygwin which I don't fully understand. now the forces of openness have a powerful and unexpected new ally http://ibm.com/linux/ -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com