Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 14:55:08 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time) From: Joachim Achtzehnter To: Subject: Re: cp uses NT5 permissions on NT4 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > Joachim Achtzehnter wrote: > > > > with notepad I get "Access Denied". Looking at the Security/Permissions > > tab for one of the new files I get an error like this: > > > > The security information for D:\release\CE-status.txt is not standard > > and cannot be displayed... The information may have been modified by a > > computer running Windows NT 5.0, which supports these features and can > > edit information which uses them. > > This has nothing to do with NT5. Sure. I mentioned NT5 because NT4's security tab told me that it suspected that a system running NT5 may have screwed things up. Of course, we don't have NT5. My guess was that CYGWIN was to blame instead, and I wasn't wrong, was I? > It's dependent of the way `ntsec' uses the ACLs. Ok. > NT4 does correctly interpret the stored ACL information. This depends on how you define 'correctly'. I started with a directory tree on a remote shared drive which I can read (and I think also write, but this should be irrelevant here). I copy the tree to my local drive, on which I have full control, using CYGWIN's cp command. The outcome is that I cannot read any of the copied files or directories. This is certainly not what I would have expected. Using the security tab one is offered the opportunity to overwrite the "non-standard" security information which can be used to fix the situtation after the copy. > Only the GUI interface (the security tab) isn't able to deal with the > permissions set in some cases. As I explained, it is not only the GUI interface. I cannot access the files until I manually 'fix' the security information. > Please have a look into the online documentation Thanks for the pointer. Even after reading this I don't see how it explains what happens in this case. The only convenient solution for now, is to revert to CYGWIN-b20 which works as I would have expected. Joachim -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com