Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-Id: <4.3.1.2.20001206142217.02101860@pop.ma.ultranet.com> X-Sender: lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1 Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2000 14:23:29 -0500 To: Bruce Edge , cygwin support From: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" Subject: Re: O_NONBLOCK serial I/O blocks on 95, OK on NT In-Reply-To: <3A2E8EBA.5EEB6BA3@sattel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 02:08 PM 12/6/2000, Bruce Edge wrote: >I'm opening /dev/com1 as follows: > fd = open( "/dev/com1", O_RDWR | O_NOCTTY | O_NONBLOCK | O_BINARY ); > >on NT the O_NONBLOCK works fine. >on win 95, read( fd, buf, max_len ) blocks. > >I don't think the termios stuff should affect this, at least if it did, I >should be having the same problem under NT. >Is there a fix for this? >Or, is there any way to check for chars pending before reading? >I'm already using select(), which shouldn't even drop out of the wait until >there's data. Perhaps this is related to this? http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2000-11/msg01544.html If so, you may find some insight by reading this thread... Larry Hall lhall AT rfk DOT com RFK Partners, Inc. http://www.rfk.com 118 Washington Street (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office Holliston, MA 01746 (508) 893-9889 - FAX -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com