Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <3A2C2FD5.7AACB10C@sattel.com> Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2000 15:59:17 -0800 From: Bruce Edge Organization: Sattel Global Networks X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.15-4mdk i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin support Subject: syslogger, NT vs. Win 95 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit After spending some time debugging on both NT and win 95, I have to say, I like the win 95 method for handling syslog messages much better. Putting the syslog message text in a file is much more conveniant than having to dig them out of the NT event loggger. You can "tail -f" the generated file and view events in pseudo-real-time, just like in unix, whereas the NT event logger seems to be optimized for systems that don't generate many events. It's impossible to get a quasi-real-time log dumped to stdout. One must click on each event to extract the text that was logged. I'd like to suggest that the NT event logger mechanism be made into an option that can be disabled. As long as I'm at it, a time stamp in the file would be nice too. Just my $.02 -Bruce. -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com