Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com To: Chuck DOT Irvine AT mail DOT sprint DOT com Cc: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com, ntemacs-users AT cs DOT washington DOT edu Subject: Re: ediff falsely identifying a difference as white space only References: From: Bill Pringlemeir Date: 29 Nov 2000 17:36:03 -0500 In-Reply-To: Chuck.Irvine@mail.sprint.com's message of "Wed, 29 Nov 2000 12:22:02 -0600" Message-ID: Lines: 39 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >>>>> "Chuck" == Chuck Irvine writes: Chuck> I'm trying to use vc-resolve-conflicts using ntemacs (20.7.1) Chuck> and Cygwin (1.1.x). First I had to download the newestest Chuck> version of ediff because the one that ships with ntemacs Chuck> expects a version of diff(3) that accepts the -binary Chuck> flag. Diff that comes with Cygwin doesn't accept this Chuck> arg. After I installed ediff, I tried to invoke Chuck> vc-resolve-conflicts on the attached file (A.java). The ediff Chuck> windows came up as expected, highlighting a single Chuck> conflict. The problem is that when I moved to this conflict, Chuck> ediff outputs in the mode line "Only white-space differences Chuck> in region 1 in buffers A & B" which, if you look, isn't the Chuck> case. I have an NT diff.exe that accepts a binary option. I used the latest gnudiff source to make the file. I don't know if that helps you. I just looked at the latest ediff source ("ftp.cs.sunysb.edu") and it looks like they corrected what I just posted about 2-3 hours ago on this list. I am not having any problems diffing things now. I have done diffs with visual source safe (using a different VC method). I looked at some sources to merge VSS support into vc.el and vc-hooks.el, but it seems to be based on packages before the custom interface (19.34). I had it half way there yesterday and then decided that I should merge it on my Linux system at home. In any case, I have "cmp.exe, diff.exe, diff3.exe, sdiff.exe" compiled with mingw that I would mail to you if you like. Or I can attempt to diff the source, but I doubt you want to patch and recompile?!? I will email them to you if you like. They are probably more current than the cygwin stuff. fwiw, Bill -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com