Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.0.20001126033046.02998100@pop.bresnanlink.net> X-Sender: cabbey AT pop DOT bresnanlink DOT net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0 Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2000 03:38:36 -0600 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Chris Abbey Subject: Re: Subscribers to cygwin mailing list can post regardless of spam blocks In-Reply-To: <20001125233008.A30869@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Note-from-DJ: This may be spam At 23:30 11/25/00 -0500, CGF wrote: >I hope that this will enable the vast majority of who are blocked by >ORBS to post here. It won't help, of course, if you use an email >address that is other than the one you used to subscribe. while the reasoning is just and good, the side effect is to reduce the effect of ORBS. Without people getting bounce notices when they try to post they may not know that their ISP is being a bad netizen, if they don't know then they can't express their outrage either in writing or (much more effectively) with their pocket books. Would it be possible to still generate a note back to them? maybe not on every message, perhaps monthly? I mean if you're going to use ORBS why destroy the single most effective corrective thing it does? now the forces of openness have a powerful and unexpected new ally http://ibm.com/linux/ -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com