Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 23:01:30 -0500 Message-Id: <200011210401.XAA10968@envy.delorie.com> X-Authentication-Warning: envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT envy DOT delorie DOT com using -f From: DJ Delorie To: rth AT redhat DOT com CC: zackw AT Stanford DOT EDU, Kelley DOT Cook AT home DOT com, Cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com, gcc-bugs AT gcc DOT gnu DOT org, gcc-patches AT gcc DOT gnu DOT org In-reply-to: <20001120194446.A17399@redhat.com> (message from Richard Henderson on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 19:44:46 -0800) Subject: Re: Reason for cygwin GCC 2.97 non-bootstrap found References: <200011202245 DOT eAKMjjN27680 AT plmlir3 DOT mail DOT eds DOT com> <20001120154222 DOT O17712 AT wolery DOT stanford DOT edu> <20001120192414 DOT D17317 AT redhat DOT com> <20001120193449 DOT Y17712 AT wolery DOT stanford DOT edu> <20001120194446 DOT A17399 AT redhat DOT com> > IMO there's no pressing reason to do _any_ of it in libiberty, The original patches included an implementation of valloc() in libiberty, for systems that didn't have one, so that ggc could rely on a working valloc. -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com