Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <3A15411C.1EA6645C@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 15:30:52 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen Reply-To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-SMP i686) X-Accept-Language: de, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin Subject: Re: Can cygwin be used on windows 2000 ? References: <0B0A39652BB0D411BCCF00508B9512EC0515E4 AT tx14exm05 DOT ftw DOT mot DOT c om> <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20001115122349 DOT 00b89b00 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> <5563-Fri17Nov2000141127+0000-starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit David Starks-Browning wrote: > > On Wednesday 15 Nov 00, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) writes: > > At 12:16 PM 11/15/2000, Bishop Chad-QCB004 wrote: > > >Can cygwin be used on windows 2000 ? > > > > Yes. > > > > Any chance that we could get the FAQ and/or the main Cygwin home page updated > > to mention W2K too? > > I'll add it to the "What is it?" section of the FAQ. > > (What about ME? You know what I mean...) Hehe. But seriously: Simply mention ME. I'm not quite sure but I think it would be a good idea to drop every special mentioning of W2K or 98 in the FAQ. Why not change each occurency of "NT" to "NT/W2K" and each occurency of "95" or "98" to "9x/ME"? Except for those cases, of course, where a special problem of a specific OS variation is described as, for example, the "How to get Winsock2 for Windows 95". Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Red Hat, Inc. mailto:vinschen AT redhat DOT com -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com