Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <3A150DFC.B799E61F@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 11:52:44 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-SMP i686) X-Accept-Language: de, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: PLEASE use mirrors References: <20001108223543 DOT A7934 AT redhat DOT com> <8970-Thu16Nov2000154022+0000-starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk> <20001116111606 DOT C19438 AT redhat DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Christopher Faylor wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 03:40:22PM +0000, David Starks-Browning wrote: > >On Wednesday 8 Nov 00, Christopher Faylor writes: > >> If you all don't start using mirrors, then there will be steps taken to > >> stop direct user downloads from the cygwin directory. This will not > >> affect mirror downloads, only normal downloads. > > > >I'm in favor of doing this now. Why not? I can't imagine anyone > >truly depends on it, given the number of mirrors we have. You'll have > >to make special arrangements (e.g. http) for the snapshots page. > > I guess we could use mirrors on the snapshots page. What's the problem here at all? Most of the existing mirrors are mirroring the snapshots as well. Of course, they mirror the ftp snapshots but why should it be necessary to mirror http? Wouldn't it be easier to drop the http snapshot page in favor of ftp and cvs? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Red Hat, Inc. mailto:vinschen AT redhat DOT com -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com