Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2000 11:16:29 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: binutils-20001029-1.tar.gz is missing info files
Message-ID: <20001115111629.C7893@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <20001115102903 DOT A303 AT dothill DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <20001115102903.A303@dothill.com>; from Jason.Tishler@dothill.com on Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 10:29:03AM -0500

On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 10:29:03AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
>Attempting to search the archives for binutils 20001029-1 and gcc
>2.95.2-3, I don't seem to find any announcements for these versions.  Is
>it encouraged or discouraged to use these versions.

If setup installs it by default, it is encouraged.  In fact, it's
required.

I don't know why the info files are missing for binutils, however.

I did discuss 2.95.2-3 in this mailing list.  It was the version that
DJ patched to fix the CRLF cpp problems.  The lack of an announcement
for 20001019 was an oversight.  I was waiting for this to propagate to
mirrors and then forgot about it.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com