Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 17:03:29 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: long double support in cygwin
Message-ID: <20001113170329.B10621@redhat.com>
Reply-To: newlib AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <99B82AA9708ED0119B55006097125A00405B5E AT ifk63 DOT mach DOT uni-karlsruhe DOT de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <99B82AA9708ED0119B55006097125A00405B5E@ifk63.mach.uni-karlsruhe.de>; from heribert_dahms@icon-gmbh.de on Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 10:54:03PM +0100

Can we PLEASE move this discussion to the newlib mailing list?

On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 10:54:03PM +0100, Heribert Dahms wrote:
>since I've never used DJGPP, I don't know it's licensing implications.
>Is it possible for Red Hat to use it the required way?
>
>Bye, Heribert (heribert_dahms AT icon-gmbh DOT de)
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From:	Stephen L Moshier [SMTP:moshier AT mediaone DOT net]
>> Sent:	Sunday, November 12, 2000 05:01
>> To:	Christopher Faylor
>> Cc:	cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
>> Subject:	Re: long double support in cygwin
>> 
>> [Heribert]  [snip] 
>> 
>>You could have copied the implementations from the old linux libc,
>>glibc 1 or 2 libraries, from libio, from gmp, or from DJGPP.  The
>>printf in newlib is BSD.  That has previously been modified for long
>>double support in linux libc 4, as a contributed item for DJGPP and,
>>one would think, by BSD as well.  Why aren't you using any of these six
>>or seven codes that various people have indeed implemented?  What is
>>the policy?

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com